Eye catching image intended to make me seem more authoritative.
This tweet piqued my interest in how Dawkins might have described the omnibeast worshipped by so many.
@sandrider69: @RichardDawkins I have just read the opening salvo of Chapter 2 The God Delusion. There cannot be a more entertaining paragraph anywhere!
Excerpted from “The God Delusion”, by Richard Dawkins
The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully. Those of us schooled from infancy in his ways can be desensitized to their horror.
Those two sentences from that paragraph ring true. Dawkins accurately describes characteristics of the omnibeast as it and its acts are described in its own holy anthology.
It still gives me pause to experience the high degree of denial, dismissal, and irrational reasoning necessary to describe the beast as king, gentle, and loving. Amazing.
Saw this on Twitter. Chuckled and reflected on the elegance of a fundamental truth.
@sherlockmichael: Science is not inherently anti-religion, reality is; science is merely the means by which reality is brought to light.
Sometimes you just gotta say something.
In A Deeper Look at If Evolution Is True, llamapacker puts the intellectually mere mortals among us on notice of the upcoming complexity of creation.
This is part of a very complicated discussion about creation.
I confess (well…) to deep anticipatory angst in advance at what I expected would be a severe intellectual thrashing.
I saw a link to something. I didn’t bother. I was still enthralled at the upcoming intellectually complex creation argument.
The evolutionary debate is complex on its own, but it is often further complicated by the use of a logical fallacy known as equivocation.
I am once again disappointed at yet another vacuous “argument” for creation. Thankfully, it was mercifully brief.
Science cannot be debated, countered, displaced, disproved, mitigated, obfuscated, or negated by magic.
The “argument”, wether purportedly complex or genuinely so, is nothing but a diversion. For honest believers, it permits compliance and provides cover from reality. For the self-serving, it provides a power base and income steam (it’s great for comedians, too). For others it’s a compulsion to which they must respond.
Well, I always thought magic was fun.
Satan Wears Diapers?
From the National Library in Stockholm
The Codex Gigas or the Devil’s Bible at the National Library in Stockholm is famous for two features. First, it is reputed to be the biggest surviving European manuscript. (Codex Gigas means ‘giant book’.) Secondly, it contains a large, full page portrait of the Devil.
Just so there’s no confusion, this is a Latin language christian bible. Who else would put a diaper on Satan?